1 June 30, 2016
Articles and Statements
1. Alexander S. Semenov, Vladimir V. Bulat
On Ethnical and Social Stratification in Еneolithic Lower Volga Region According to Khvalynsk Culture Data
Slavery: Theory and Practice, 2016, Vol.(1), Is. 1, pp. 4-13.
Number of views: 817 Download in PDF
2. Anvar M. MamadalievSlavery: Theory and Practice, 2016, Vol.(1), Is. 1, pp. 4-13.
Abstract:
This paper analyzes the problems of inequality and the presence of slavery in the Eneolithic in Eastern Europe on the materials of the Khvalynsk cemetery. Based on the presence of signs of inequality in the tombs it concludes the existence of Patriarchal inequality and slavery. On the basis of paleoDNK data it discusses the different ethnic roots of the elite and the enslaved population.
This paper analyzes the problems of inequality and the presence of slavery in the Eneolithic in Eastern Europe on the materials of the Khvalynsk cemetery. Based on the presence of signs of inequality in the tombs it concludes the existence of Patriarchal inequality and slavery. On the basis of paleoDNK data it discusses the different ethnic roots of the elite and the enslaved population.
Number of views: 817 Download in PDF
The Institution of Slavery of Kievan Rus Epoch of Yaroslav the Wise and Classical Slavery of Antiquity: a Comparative Analysis
Slavery: Theory and Practice, 2016, Vol.(1), Is. 1, pp. 14-23.
Number of views: 842 Download in PDF
3. Lev R. ProzorovSlavery: Theory and Practice, 2016, Vol.(1), Is. 1, pp. 14-23.
Abstract:
The article is devoted to the comparative analysis of the institutions of classical slavery of antiquity with the institution of slavery in the heyday of the feudal monarchy of Russ – in the second half of the XI century. This period is on the board of one of the most productive national rulers – Yaroslav I Vladimirovich the Wise and his sons. The paper gives a characterization and comparative analysis of classical slavery of antiquity, the slavery of the ancient Slavs and in the early period of the Russian state, the institution of slavery, enshrined in the Russian Truth. The author comes to the conclusion that the ancient russian state, which according to tradition was called the Kievan Rus, it is hardly fair to call the slavery feudal monarchy, as the slavery in the form in which it is usually understood (referring to his classic version) does not exist.
The article is devoted to the comparative analysis of the institutions of classical slavery of antiquity with the institution of slavery in the heyday of the feudal monarchy of Russ – in the second half of the XI century. This period is on the board of one of the most productive national rulers – Yaroslav I Vladimirovich the Wise and his sons. The paper gives a characterization and comparative analysis of classical slavery of antiquity, the slavery of the ancient Slavs and in the early period of the Russian state, the institution of slavery, enshrined in the Russian Truth. The author comes to the conclusion that the ancient russian state, which according to tradition was called the Kievan Rus, it is hardly fair to call the slavery feudal monarchy, as the slavery in the form in which it is usually understood (referring to his classic version) does not exist.
Number of views: 842 Download in PDF
About the Ethnicity of "Smerds"
Slavery: Theory and Practice, 2016, Vol.(1), Is. 1, pp. 24-27.
Number of views: 809 Download in PDF
4. Slavery: Theory and Practice, 2016, Vol.(1), Is. 1, pp. 24-27.
Abstract:
The content of the term "smerd", the status of this population is one of the most difficult questions of social history of pre-mongol Russia. Materials for the preparation of manuscripts are national studies on the history of Kievan Russ and the Russian principalities of XI–XIII centuries. During the XX – early XXI centuries this topic was researched by I.Ya. Froyanov, B. Ryskin, A.V. Karpov, N.M. Tupikov, M.B. Sverdlov, A.L. Shilov and others. The methodological basis of the study was the principles of objectivity and historicism, suggesting an unbiased approach to the analysis of the studied problems, a critical attitude to the sources, making judgments in the analysis of the totality of the facts and the screening phenomena in the development and the context of the historical situation. The author comes to the conclusion that all these circumstances constitute a serious obstruction to output of I.Y. Froyanov about by far the different ethnicity, originally non-Slavic origin of ancient smerds.
The content of the term "smerd", the status of this population is one of the most difficult questions of social history of pre-mongol Russia. Materials for the preparation of manuscripts are national studies on the history of Kievan Russ and the Russian principalities of XI–XIII centuries. During the XX – early XXI centuries this topic was researched by I.Ya. Froyanov, B. Ryskin, A.V. Karpov, N.M. Tupikov, M.B. Sverdlov, A.L. Shilov and others. The methodological basis of the study was the principles of objectivity and historicism, suggesting an unbiased approach to the analysis of the studied problems, a critical attitude to the sources, making judgments in the analysis of the totality of the facts and the screening phenomena in the development and the context of the historical situation. The author comes to the conclusion that all these circumstances constitute a serious obstruction to output of I.Y. Froyanov about by far the different ethnicity, originally non-Slavic origin of ancient smerds.
Number of views: 809 Download in PDF